Blog

Arizona Water Canals

The Ancient Desert Dwellers

The ancestors of present-day Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian and Gila River Indian communities were farmers who lived in central and southern Arizona for about 1,400 years before European and American explorers came to the region. The intricate canal system that they built spanned nearly 500 miles and may have served as many as 50,000 people at one time.

Archaeologists don’t know exactly why the ancient farmers stopped maintaining their canals around 1450 A.D. It is thought that environmental changes, drought, violent floods or eroding rivers may have made it difficult to farm the Salt River Valley.

The ancient desert dwellers set the groundwork for the water canal system, which follows many of the same paths today.

The Pioneers

In the 1860s, a central Arizona gold rush brought an influx of people to the Salt River Valley. In December 1867, a group of 17 of these new arrivals formed the Swilling Irrigation and Canal Company. They planned to take water from the Salt River by canal so they could grow crops to sell to miners at Wickenburg and the U.S. Cavalry stationed at Fort McDowell. The waterway became known as the Swilling Ditch, later the Town Ditch or the Salt River Valley Canal.

By March 1868, farmers under the Swilling Irrigation and Canal Company had harvested their first crops on land near the present-day Arizona State Hospital. During that same month, a government survey party came to the Valley and noted that a small community calling itself “Phoenix” had appeared on the scene.

Settlers form a Water Association

A severe drought in the late 1890s created a water shortage in the Valley. At one point, river flow dwindled to 25 cubic feet (about 187 gallons) per second. Thousands of acres of agricultural land went out of production. Orchards withered. Hundreds of people moved away.

For those who remained, the obvious solution was to build a water storage dam to capture spring runoff. In 1902, the National Reclamation Act was passed into law. The Act provided for government loans to “reclaim” arid lands in the West with irrigation projects. In 1903, the Valley settlers formed the Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association. The Association pledged more than 200,000 acres of land as collateral in order to secure a government loan to build a water storage and delivery system.

While the major effort in Arizona was the Theodore Roosevelt Dam, government engineers also saw an opportunity to improve existing Valley canals and create efficiencies by unifying the canal system. One by one, the government purchased the Valley’s private canals.

In 1917, operation of the canal system was turned over to the Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association, which still operates the canals for the federal government today.

Arizona’s Major Water Canals

Over the past 100-plus years, nine major canals have emerged across the greater Valley.

1. Arizona Canal (1883)

Measuring more than 38 miles long, the Arizona Canal is the longest canal in Arizona. It’s the main canal that transports water to all others on the north side of the Salt River.

The canal was the work of the Arizona Canal Company, which was formed in December 1882. Construction began in May 1883 and was completed in 1885. Water began flowing the next year. The Arizona Canal helped bring water to the north and across to the West Valley, allowing for development of these areas.

The original heading was the old Arizona Dam, located on the Salt River about a mile below the mouth of the Verde River. Unfortunately, that dam was destroyed in a spring flood in 1885. A stronger Arizona Dam was rebuilt by December 1886. Though the second Arizona Dam was the only pioneer diversion dam that survived the big flood of February 1891, it was damaged by a flood in 1905 during the construction of Roosevelt Dam. In an effort to unify the Valley’s water delivery system, the Secretary of Interior agreed to purchase the canal in 1906. The government assumed operations of the Arizona Canal in May of 1907.

2. Grand Canal (1878)

The Grand Canal is the oldest remaining pioneer canal on the north side of the Salt River. It was planned in 1877 and constructed in 1878 by the Grand Canal Company. The original heading of the Grand Canal was plagued by washouts, which would interrupt its water supply for months at a time, so the Old Crosscut Canal was built to provide a more reliable water supply from the Arizona Dam and the Arizona Canal. Today, the Grand Canal receives water from the Arizona Canal by way of the New Crosscut Canal.

The Grand Canal provided a better route for service of central Phoenix than the Salt River Valley Canal, which led to the abandonment of the Salt River Valley Canal in 1925.

The federal government purchased the Grand Canal for $25,731 in June 1906. At that time, the canal served about 17,000 acres.

3. The Crosscut Canals: Old and new (1889 and 1912)

The Old Crosscut Canal was built near 48th Street by the Arizona Improvement Company to unify the entire northside canal system by connecting the Arizona and Grand canals. After the New Crosscut was built near 64th Street, the Old Crosscut was used only for drainage, emergency flood relief or during repairs to the New Crosscut.

The New Crosscut (or Arizona Crosscut) was financed and built by the Water Users’ Association in 1912 and turned over to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation upon completion in 1913. This canal leaves the Arizona Canal near 64th Street and crosses Papago Park before it drops 116 feet through penstocks (pipes) to the Crosscut Hydroelectric Generating Station south of Washington Street. Then it enters the Grand Canal. The completion of the New Crosscut Canal and hydro plant made electric power generation possible on the canals while still allowing for the efficient delivery of irrigation water.

When it was built, the Crosscut Hydro Plant was the second-largest generating station, the Roosevelt Dam was the largest. The New Crosscut Canal’s bank is where the Valley’s first concrete canal-side bicycle path was built in 1975.

4. South Canal (1908)

The South Canal serves the very important purpose of taking water from the Salt River at the Granite Reef Diversion Dam to all of the other canals on the south side of the Salt River.

The South Canal was built by the federal government between 1907 and 1909 to unify the entire southside canal system. Originally, the South Canal was only 2 miles long before splitting into the Consolidated and Eastern canals. However, the Consolidated Canal, nearer to the river, was repeatedly damaged by floods. In 1920, the Eastern Canal was widened to become the main canal for the southside system. The entire 10-mile stretch to the division gates where the Consolidated and Tempe canals separate is now called the South Canal. The first South Canal hydro plant, built in 1912 at the split of the Consolidated and Eastern canals, was moved to its present site in 1924 to take advantage of a drop in the canal. From 1927 to 1929, the South Canal and parts of the Eastern and Consolidated canals were lined with concrete. The concrete liner saved water and increased the supply to the Roosevelt Water Conservation District (RWCD).

The three most significant features along the canal are the Val Vista Water Treatment Plant, the Hennessy Wasteway and the South Consolidated Hydroelectric Plant.

The Hennessy Wasteway is used to discharge excess rainwater from the Salt River. It is also used as the turnout to the Granite Reef Underground Storage Project (GRUSP). Located on a 350-acre site southwest of Granite Reef Diversion Dam, GRUSP stores water from the Salt River and water delivered through the Central Arizona Project. Water is contained at the site and allowed to sink into the ground, recharging the underground aquifer and bolstering groundwater resources.

Another feature on the South Canal is the RWCD pumping plant, which takes water from the South Canal into the RWCD Canal. West of Lindsay Road, the South Canal splits and becomes the Eastern Canal to the southeast and the Consolidated Canal to the southwest.

5. Eastern Canal (1909)

The Eastern Canal is a branch of the South Canal that originates west of Lindsay Road near McDowell Road in northeast Mesa. Built by the federal government in 1909, the Eastern Canal replaced the old Highland Canal, which was one-quarter mile to the west. The Highland Canal had been completed in 1888.

Concerns about water rights, coupled with droughts in the late 1890s and early 1900s, helped motivate landowners served by the Highland Canal to pledge their property as collateral to form the Association. Today, the Eastern Canal is the site of the Town of Gilbert’s water filtration plant.

6. Consolidated Canal (1891)

Although it is the largest canal in Mesa (roughly 18 miles long), the Consolidated Canal wasn’t built to serve any of the land within the present city limits.

Started in 1891, the canal was masterminded by Dr. A.J. Chandler and his Consolidated Canal Company. Chandler’s desire was to bring water to the area that now bears his name.

Because the canal was built during one of the driest periods in the Salt River’s history, its owners faced supply problems. Lands with older water rights had first claim on the meager water supply in the Salt River, and the occasional surpluses that occurred were too small to cultivate new land.

Nevertheless, Dr. Chandler was imaginative. Recognizing the problems that owners of the Mesa and Tempe canal companies were having with brush diversion dams, he began bargaining.

In exchange for water to be saved by his proposals, Dr. Chandler offered to build a new diversion dam made of huge boulders. The south end of the dam tied into granite masonry abutments and wing walls – the head of the new canal.

Using a huge dredge, Dr. Chandler built a canal up to 26 feet deep. Two miles south of the heading, the canal emptied some of its water into the old Mesa Canal. The Consolidated Canal then divided into two branches as it does today. The Consolidated Canal also delivers to the Chandler Water Filtration Plant, which is located south of Pecos Road.

The branch heading west was called the Crosscut Canal, and for about two miles, it followed what is now Brown Road to the edge of a small mesa near the Tempe Canal. This spot is where Chandler built the Chandler Falls Power Plant that provided electricity to Mesa and Tempe.

By carrying Tempe Canal water through the Consolidated Canal, instead of through a sandy riverbed, canal owners were able to prevent a considerable amount of water loss from seepage. This “new” water became part of the Consolidated Canal, which followed the old Mesa Canal to Baseline Road and on to Chandler.

Recognizing the water savings that the Consolidated Canal made possible, the federal government later sought to acquire the canal as part of a unified water distribution system for the Association. Government engineers saw that all canals south of the Salt River could be interconnected by building a new 6-mile length of canal from Granite Reef Diversion Dam to the Consolidated Canal.

Negotiations to buy the Consolidated Canal began in 1907. It was sold to the government in November 1908 for $187,000.

7. Tempe Canal (1871)

The Tempe Canal is the oldest continuously used canal in Arizona. Construction of the Tempe Canal was undertaken by the Tempe Irrigating Canal Company, which had originally been incorporated in 1870 as the Hardy Irrigating Canal Company, though the name was changed the following year. The first Tempe Canal headed in the Salt River near what is now Mesa Drive in Mesa. It flowed along 8th Street to downtown Tempe and on to the west where it also supplied the San Francisco Canal. A branch served the Broadway-Alameda area south of downtown. By 1875, as much as 3,800 acres were being irrigated from these branches. In the 1880s, further branches were dug south along Price Road (a portion now known as the Tempe Canal), west along Guadalupe Road and around the base of South Mountain to south Phoenix. Ultimately, these canals irrigated over 25,000 acres.

Charles Trumbull Hayden, the “Father of Tempe,” was among the early homesteaders served by the canal. He first came to the Valley in 1870 and saw the need for a store, ferry service and flour mill at the river near what is now Mill Avenue. Hayden began building the mill in 1872. It began operation two years later, using power generated by water from the Tempe Canal by way of an extension ditch. Some of the earliest pioneers in this area were the Sotelo and Gonzales families, who both worked on the construction of an early branch of the Tempe Canal, the McKinney-Kirkland Ditch, and farmed in the area as well.

Due to solid water rights, Tempe Canal landowners did not join the Association when it was formed in 1903. Most landowners saw no reason to pledge their land as collateral for a federal government loan to build Roosevelt Dam. The Tempe Canal Company finally joined the Association in 1923, but not because of a shortage of water.

The increase in irrigation brought about by Roosevelt Dam raised the water table all over the Valley. Because of geological formations, land in Tempe was at high risk for waterlogging. The Association had the resources — including the electric power — to drain these lands with pumps, and its commitment to make Tempe a priority for drainage convinced the Tempe farmers to join the Association.

8. Western Canal (1912-1913)

Work on the Western Canal was started in 1911 and the government dug the canal from Price Road to 48th Street before was suspended in 1912 due to funding problems. The government also built three feeder laterals to bring a water supply from the Consolidated Canal and a siphon to carry the Western Canal under the Tempe Canal. Farmers in the south Phoenix area formed the Western Canal Construction Company in 1912 to fund and build the canal from 48th Street to 19th Avenue. When completed, this section was deeded to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and the farms of south Phoenix finally had an assured supply of water.

Some farmers in south Tempe and south Phoenix had lands on the lower slopes of South Mountain, which was above the Western Canal. In 1912, these farmers formed the Highline Canal Construction Company and sold stock. They raised $100,000 to build a pumping plant, pipeline and canal. The pumping plant took water from a bay in the Western Canal and pumped it 40 feet uphill through a 1-mile pipe, where it emptied into the Highline Lateral for distribution.

From the Tempe Canal, the Western Canal heads west then turns and curves around to the northwest along the foothills of South Mountain. Roughly at the Maricopa Freeway, the canal continues its western jaunt, then dips to the southwest near 7th Avenue.

Drivers traveling along Baseline Road between the freeway and Central Avenue can see the Western Canal just north of the road. The Western Canal now has the Highline Pumping Plant, located east of Kyrene Road, to lift water to the Highline Canal.

9. The Central Arizona Project (1968)

As the state of Arizona grew, water providers understood that additional water supplies would be necessary to support Arizona’s cities, agriculture, business and industry, and so the Central Arizona Project (CAP), to life. The CAP’s canal system transports water across the desert from the Colorado River, carrying it to the state’s central valley where it adds to the region’s supply.

Lateral Canals

Arizona’s irrigation system includes hundreds of smaller waterways that connect to the main canals. These ditches, called laterals, take water from the large canals to delivery points in irrigated areas. Of the 1,074 miles of drains and laterals, over 85% have been piped to help reduce water loss — and more are lined or piped each year.

Water is routed into and through these laterals by a series of turnout gates. Residential irrigation customers take their water entitlement at regularly scheduled intervals throughout the year by opening valves that release water onto their property for specific time periods.

Most laterals north of the Salt River in urban areas are underground. Many of the laterals that take water from canals in agricultural areas south of the river are open ditches.

FAQ Chapter 7 Bankruptcy

Cash on Hand – What does that meaN?

Cash on hand is anything in a bank account, safety deposit box, your wallet, under the mattress, etc. Money that is “pending” in your bank account is considered to still be in the account! So just because you have written checks from your account, unless they have cleared your account it is still considered to be in your account and “cash on hand”!

WHAT HAPPENS IF I HAVE TOO MUCH CASH ON HAND?

You give it to the bankruptcy trustee!

Pitfalls of Bankruptcy

AVOID THE FIPFALLS OF BANKRUPTCY!

stop incurring more debt

Prior to filing bankruptcy you must stop using your credit cards. If you borrow money with the specific intent of discharging the debt in bankruptcy instead of paying it back, the debt is not dischargeable. Cash advances before bankruptcy can be seen as fraudulent and unable to discharge in bankruptcy.

Section 523 of the bankruptcy code also provides that there is a presumption that certain consumer debt created right before filing a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy is non-dischargeable. 

preferential treatment of creditors

Do not pay back money to family members or friends before filing bankruptcy.

do not give away or transfer assets

Do not transfer assets to friends, family and business associates prior to filing bankruptcy in an attempt to conceal those assets from your creditors. The transfer may be considered a fraudulent. If it is deemed fraudulent, you may lose both the property and your right to a bankruptcy discharge.

Carefully choose the creditors you pay. some creditors, such as landlords, secured creditors, and some utilities should be paid under most circumstances. If you pay a credit card debt that eventually will be discharged, you may be throwing money away.

These blog posts are not intended nor shall it be deemed to be the rendering of legal advice. Reading these blog posts does not create an attorney-client relationship, nor shall it impose an obligation on the part of the attorney to respond to further inquiry. Contact the Dunaway Law Group at 480-389-6529 or message us HERE.

Unmanned Aircraft Defined

Interestingly, the Chicago Convention, which is considered to be the magna carta of civil aircraft, never actually defines the word “aircraft”. In 1967, in response to advancements in technology, ICAO re-defined “aircraft” as “any machine that can drive support in the atmosphere from the reactions of the are other than the reactions of the are against the Earth’s surface,” This change in the definition of “aircraft” came primarily as a response to the invention of “hovercraft”. A hovercraft is a machine that elevates itself off of the ground by pushing in downward to lift the vehicle off of the ground. Because a hovercraft creates lift by pushing air onto the ground it is not capable of “flying” more than a few inches in the air. 

The need for ICAO to redefine one of its most fundamental words, “aircraft” due to development of previously unforeseen technology, the hovercraft, is a perfect example of how quickly technology can change and how it can make prior norms outdated.

Unmanned Aircraft are Aircraft-

Determining what is, and is not, an “aircraft” is so important because it determines whether it falls under the purview of ICAO. If it does, then it is held to the same standard as traditional manned aircraft and must comply with all of the same requirements. 

Upon initial review, defining “unmanned aircraft” seems to be intuitive and somewhat self-explanatory. However, with close examination and careful thought what is and is not “unmanned” becomes less clear. For example, what if there is not a pilot in the aircraft but the aircraft is being flown by a person standing on the ground, using a remote control? Or must an “unmanned” aircraft be one that is flown completely autonomously without any human input? 

The plain wording of Article 8 makes clear that the drafters intended “pilotless aircraft” to include aircraft that were remotely controlled, e.g., from the ground (via radio signals); thus, “pilotless aircraft” in the sense that Article 8 refers to an aircraft flown without a “pilot” of Article 32, which provides, “the pilot of every aircraft and the other members of the operating crew of every aircraft engaged in international navigation shall be provided with certificates of competency and licenses issued or rendered valid by the state in which the aircraft is registered”.

Defining “pilotless” is of great importance because, “no aircraft capable of being flown without a pilot shall be flown without a pilot over the territory of a Contracting State without special authorization by that state and in accordance with the terms of such authorization. Each contracting State undertakes to ensure that the flight of such aircraft without a pilot shall be so controlled as to obviate danger to the Civil aircraft.” 

The term “without a pilot” was later clarified to mean that an “aircraft which is intended to be operated with no pilot on board shall be further classified as unmanned,” Furthermore, “unmanned aircraft shall include remotely-piloted aircraft.” 

An aircraft is not required to be fully autonomous in order to be unmanned. An aircraft that is controlled by a person is still “unmanned”, so long as the person controlling the aircraft is not located within the aircraft. For example, a quad-copter- drone that is controlled remotely by a person on the ground is still an unmanned aircraft. RPA as “an unmanned aircraft which is piloted from a remote pilot station”.

All unmanned aircraft, whether remotely piloted, fully autonomous or combinations thereof, are subject to the provisions of Article 8 and inter alia the ICAO. Annex 7 makes it clear that remotely piloted aircraft (RPA), are simply one type of unmanned aircraft, and all unmanned pilotless aircraft, whether remotely-piloted, fully autonomous, or combinations thereof, are subject to the provisions of Article 8 of the Chicago convention. Because RPAS are aircraft, ICAO is responsible for their international air travel. They are held to the ICAO standards.

If you stay up at night and pontificate about the differences between manned and unmanned aircraft then contact the Dunaway Law Group at 623-252-6884 or message us HERE.