Blog

Featured

Type 2 Non-Irrigation Water Rights

Understanding Type 2 Non-Irrigation Water Rights and Their Conveyance

Type 2 non-irrigation water rights play a significant role. Among the various types of water rights, This blog post delves into what these rights entail, how they can be conveyed, and the specifics of A.R.S. 45-474, the Arizona Revised Statute that governs the transfer of these rights.

What are Type 2 Non-Irrigation Water Rights?

In Arizona, water rights are categorized based on their usage. Type 2 non-irrigation water rights are specific to non-agricultural uses, such as industrial, commercial, or residential purposes. These rights are allocated based on historic use and are typically associated with land that has a history of non-irrigation water use. A Type 2 right is not tied to the land; the certificate is the only way to determine ownership.

Characteristics of Type 2 Non-Irrigation Water Rights

  1. Historical Use: These rights are established based on the historical use of groundwater for non-irrigation purposes. This means that the volume of water allocated is determined by the amount used historically by the right holder.
  2. Flexibility: Unlike irrigation rights, Type 2 rights are not tied to a specific parcel of land. This flexibility makes them valuable, as they can be leased or sold independently of the land.
  3. Transferability: These rights can be transferred between parties, making them a tradable commodity within the regulatory framework established by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR).

Conveyance of Type 2 Non-Irrigation Water Rights: A.R.S. 45-474

The conveyance, or transfer, of Type 2 non-irrigation water rights is governed by A.R.S. 45-474. This statute outlines the procedures and requirements for legally transferring these rights from one party to another. Here are the key provisions:

Application Process

  1. Filing an Application: The process begins with the filing of an application with the ADWR. Both the seller (current right holder) and the buyer (new right holder) must be involved in this application.
  2. Details Required: The application must include detailed information about the water right, such as the certificate number, the amount of water historically used, and the intended use by the new right holder.

Review and Approval

  1. ADWR Review: Upon receiving the application, the ADWR reviews it to ensure compliance with all regulatory requirements. This includes verifying the historical use and ensuring that the transfer will not adversely impact other water users.
  2. Public Notice: In some cases, the ADWR may require a public notice of the proposed transfer. This allows other stakeholders an opportunity to raise any concerns or objections.
  3. Approval: If the application meets all requirements and no valid objections are raised, the ADWR approves the transfer. The new right holder then receives a revised certificate of water right.
Arizona Water Canal

Conditions and Restrictions

  1. Beneficial Use: The new right holder must demonstrate that the water will be put to a beneficial use. This means the water must be used for legitimate non-irrigation purposes as defined by Arizona law.
  2. Consistency with Management Plans: The transfer must be consistent with the management plans of the Active Management Area (AMA) where the water right is located. AMAs are designated areas with specific water management goals to ensure sustainable water use.
  3. No Injury Rule: The transfer must not cause harm or “injury” to other existing water rights. This is to ensure that the transfer does not negatively affect the water supply for other users in the area.

Conclusion

Type 2 non-irrigation water rights are a vital component of Arizona’s water management strategy, providing flexibility and tradability for non-agricultural water use. The conveyance of these rights, governed by A.R.S. 45-474, involves a detailed process to ensure that transfers are conducted legally and sustainably. Understanding this process is crucial for anyone involved in buying or selling these valuable water rights.

By adhering to the guidelines set forth in A.R.S. 45-474, stakeholders can ensure that their transactions are compliant with state laws, thereby contributing to the efficient and equitable management of Arizona’s water resources.

If you are interested in purchasing a Type 2 non-irrigation water right then contact attorney Clint Dunaway at 480-702-1608 or message us HERE.

The Dunaway Law Group provides this information as a service to clients and other friends for educational purposes only. It should not be construed or relied on as legal advice and does not create a lawyer-client or attorney-prospective client relationship. The law changes quickly and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. As such, readers should not act upon this information without seeking advice from professional advisers. Additionally, this Firm limits its practice to the states of Arizona and New York.

Certificate of Assured Water Supply

Arizona’s Certificate of Assured Water Supply (CAWS) is a crucial component of the state’s water management strategy. Designed to ensure sustainable water use, the CAWS guarantees that new developments in Active Management Areas (AMAs) have a 100-year assured water supply. Here, we explore what it takes to obtain this certificate, the timeline involved, and the associated costs.

What is a Certificate of Assured Water Supply?

The CAWS is a certification issued by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). It serves as a verification that a new subdivision within an AMA has a legally, physically, and continuously available water supply for the next century. This certificate is essential for developers before they can sell or lease subdivided lands.

When is a CAWS Required?

A Certificate of Assured Water Supply (CAWS) must be obtained when land is subdivided within an active management area and is not served by a designated water provider.

Requirements for Obtaining a CAWS

1. Legal Availability of Water

  • Applicants must demonstrate they have the legal right to the water they plan to use. This can involve water rights, contracts, or other legal mechanisms. An applicant must demonstrate legal rights to all water supplies included in the application. (See: A.A.C. R12-15-718).

2. Physical Availability of Water

  • The water supply must be physically accessible and sustainable. This requires hydrological studies and models to prove that the water source will remain reliable over the 100-year period. Sources of water have specific requirements for demonstration of physical availability. A list of those specific requirements can be found in the Arizona Administrative Code. (See: A.A.C. R12-15-716).

3. Continuous Availability

  • The water supply must be available without interruption. This often involves proving infrastructure capacity, such as wells and storage facilities. Water providers or developers must demonstrate that the water supply is uninterruptible for the 100-year period, or that sufficient backup supplies exist for any anticipated shortages. (See: A.A.C. R12-15-717).

4. Water Quality

  • The water must meet quality standards set by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ). Proposed sources of water must satisfy existing state water quality standards and any other quality standards applicable to the proposed use after treatment. (See: A.A.C. R12-15-719).

5. Financial Capability

  • The applicant must demonstrate the financial capability to construct and maintain the necessary water infrastructure. Water providers or developers must demonstrate financial capability to construct the water delivery system and any storage or treatment facilities. Financial capability for developers is typically considered through the local government’s subdivision review process. A demonstration is also required that adequate delivery, storage and treatment works will be available to the applicant or the applicant’s customers for 100 years. (See: A.A.C. R12-15-720).

6. Consistency with the Management Goal

  • The proposed water use must align with the AMA’s goal, which typically focuses on sustainable water use and conservation. Each AMA’s Management Plan prescribes water conservation requirements for municipal water providers. Water demand associated with proposed subdivisions is evaluated in accordance with these conservation requirements. (See: A.A.C. R12-15-721).

Type A – Type B Certificates

There are Type A and Type B Certificates of Assured Water Supply. Type A Certificates are ______________.

Type B Certificates are “The Director shall classify all certificates that do not meet the requirements of subsection (H)(1) of this Section as Type B certificates.” Ariz. Admin. Code § 12-15-704.

It is possible to submit an application to the Arizona Department of Water Resources to reclassify an existing Type Certificate.

Timeline for Obtaining a CAWS

The process of obtaining a CAWS can be lengthy. Here’s a general timeline:

1. Pre-Application Consultation

  • Engaging with ADWR early can help clarify requirements and streamline the process.

2. Application Submission

  • Once the application is complete, including all necessary studies and documentation, it is submitted to ADWR.

3. ADWR Review

  • The review process can take several months to a year, depending on the complexity of the application and the thoroughness of the initial submission.

4. Public Notice and Comment Period

  • There is a period for public notice and comments, which adds additional time to the application process. “The Director shall give public notice of an application for a certificate as provided in A.R.S. § 45-578.” Ariz. Admin. Code § 12-15-704.

5. Final of Application Determination

  • After considering all factors and public input, ADWR makes a final determination. If approved, the Certificate of Assured Water Supply is granted.

Transferability of Assured Water Certificate

An Arizona Certificate of Assured Water Supply (CAWS) is not automatically transferable when a property changes ownership because the Certificate is tied to the property owner listed on the certificate and the plat on which the application was based.

  1. Assignment of CAWS: If certain conditions are met, the existing CAWS can be assigned to the new property owner using a Type A or Type B Assignment Application. These applications have specific requirements that need to be fulfilled for the assignment to be successful. 45-579(A) “A holder of a certificate of assured water supply issued pursuant to section 45-576 may assign the certificate, in whole or in part, to another person if the holder applies to the director for approval within ten years after the original certificate was issued and the director approves the application.” If more than 10 years have passed since the certificate was originally issued then, “An application may be filed under this section more than ten years after the original certificate was issued if a minimum of five hundred lots within the subdivision covered by the certificate have been sold to individual home buyers by the holder of the certificate and any previous holders of the certificate.”
  2. Re-Issuance of CAWS: If the ownership has changed and the plat remains unchanged, a new CAWS can be issued to the new owner under certain conditions.
  3. Material Plat Change Review: If changes have been made to the plat after the CAWS was issued, a Material Plat Change Review may be required to determine if the changes are substantial enough to necessitate a new CAWS application.

The Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) handles the applications for the assignment or re-issuance of CAWS.

Costs Involved in Obtaining a CAWS

The costs associated with obtaining a CAWS can vary widely based on several factors, including the size of the development and the complexity of proving water availability. Here are some potential costs:

1. Application Fees

  • ADWR charges a fee for processing the CAWS application. As of 2014, the application fee is $1,000.

2. Hydrological Studies

  • Conducting the necessary hydrological studies can cost tens of thousands of dollars. These studies are essential for proving physical availability and sustainability.

3. Legal and Consulting Fees

  • Legal and consulting fees for preparing the application, conducting studies, and navigating the regulatory process can add significantly to the cost.

4. Infrastructure Costs

  • Costs for developing the necessary water infrastructure, such as wells, pipelines, and storage facilities, can be substantial. These are often borne by the developer and can run into millions of dollars for large projects.

5. Ongoing Compliance

  • Maintaining compliance with the CAWS requirements may incur additional ongoing costs, including monitoring, reporting, and potential upgrades to infrastructure.

Conclusion

Obtaining a Certificate of Assured Water Supply in Arizona is a complex and costly process, but it is essential for ensuring sustainable water use in new developments. As water becomes an increasingly valuable resource, the CAWS plays a vital role in balancing growth with sustainability.

For more detailed and specific guidance then contact the Dunaway Law Group at 480-702-1608 or message us HERE.

The Dunaway Law Group provides this information as a service to clients and other friends for educational purposes only. It should not be construed or relied on as legal advice or to create a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking advice from professional advisers. The Firm limits its practice to the states of Arizona and New York.

Evictions and Claims of Ownership

Claims of Ownership in Justice Court Evictions

Eviction lawsuits are designed to address the issue of possession and not ownership. Eviction lawsuits are to provide a summary, speedy and adequate remedy for obtaining possession of premises withheld by tenants, and for this reason this objective would be entirely frustrated if the tenants were permitted to deny the landlord’s title, or to interpose customary and usual defenses permissible in the ordinary action at law.

The merits of the title may not be inquired into in eviction actions, otherwise the action would not afford a summary, speedy and adequate remedy for obtaining possession of the rental property. The limited scope of eviction cases is explained in A.R.S. § 22-201(D) which states;

Justice Court Judges, “have jurisdiction to try the right to possession of real property when title or ownership is not a subject of inquiry in the action. If in any such action the title or ownership of real property becomes an issue, the justice shall so certify in the court record, at once stop further proceedings in the action and forward all papers together with a certified copy of the court record in the action to the Superior Court, where the action shall be docketed and determined as though originally brought in the Superior Court.”

A.R.S. § 22-201(D)

transfer to the superior court

Notice of Transfer to Superior Court. If the Justice Court judge rules that the eviction case should be transferred to the Superior Court then the Justice Court will file a Notice of Transfer and send the complete file to the Superior Court.

Beginning of the Eviction in the Superior Court. Once an eviction lawsuit has been transferred from the Justice Court to the Superior Court, it’s as if the case was re-starting. For instance, the filing fee of $333 (as of 2024) must be paid and the tenants must be re-served with the date and time of the upcoming hearing.

Initial Eviction Hearing in the Superior Court. The initial eviction hearing in the Superior Court will be fairly quick, similar to that of the Justice Court. If the tenant appears and presents legal arguments of ownership then the Superior Court judge will set the matter for trial.

Eviction Trials in the Superior Court. At the eviction trial, both parties will present their legal arguments, documentation and testimony that support their positions. At the conclusion of the trial the Superior Court judge will decide whether or not there is a landlord-tenant relationship between the two parties or a buyer-seller relationship. If the judge determines that there is a landlord-tenant relationship then he or she will enter judgment in favor of the landlord. However, if the judge finds that there is a buyer-seller relationship then he or she will dismiss the eviction lawsuit at which point the party seeking the eviction is free to file a quiet title action to settle the dispute of ownership.

Landlord Frustration. Often, when an eviction case is transferred from the Justice Court to the Superior Court, a landlord will respond, “But my tenant doesn’t own the property! It’s mine! They’re just lying! Why does the judge believe them?”

The frustration is understandable, but it is important to remember that the Justice Court Judge is just following the law, it does not mean that he or she necessarily believes the tenant. So, it should not be interpreted as a sign that the landlord did something wrong or the tenant made some brilliant legal maneuver. It simply means the Justice Court Judge is following the law.

If you need help from an experienced eviction attorney, then contact the Dunaway Law Group at 480-702-1608 or message us HERE.

* The information provided is informational only, does not constitute legal advice, and will not create an attorney-client or attorney-prospective client relationship. Additionally, the Dunaway Law Group, PLC limits its practice to the states of Arizona and New York.