Discharge Contract in Bankruptcy

Generally speaking, courts do not like agreements that attempt to make a debt non-dischargeable in bankruptcy. Bankruptcy courts have been unreceptive to the use of consent decrees and settlement agreements which attempt to create, by contract, a debt that will be non-dischargeable in the bankruptcy of an individual.

Waivers of Discharge

Even the U.S. Supreme Court has held that waivers of discharge are unenforceable. A creditor cannot contract away a debtor’s right to defend his right to a debt discharge by using “boilerplate” covenants of non-dischargeability. Occasionally a creditor will slip language into a contract that says something like: “I understand that this debt is still owed even if I file bankruptcy”. Often this language is put into contracts used by less reputable creditors like Payday lenders or title companies.  The creditor’s hope is that the debtor will believe they are obligated to pay the debt even if they file bankruptcy.

Simply inserting this language into a contract would keep the debt from being discharged in bankruptcy then every lender in the country would put that same language into every contract they entered into. Additionally, this would completely negate the whole purpose behind personal bankruptcy.

Settlement Agreements

Settlement agreements are typically used to bring an end to parties’ disputes and provide a clear outline of the parties’ respective rights and obligations going forward.  Attorneys representing creditors will often spend a great deal of time and energy in trying to ensure that settlement agreements will actually be enforceable.

While, covenants in a settlement agreement that provide for the debtor to waive his right to a discharge are unenforceable as against public policy, creditors will still include such covenants in their settlement documents because this is an evolving area of law. Because settlements agreements related to a fraud claim may provide a narrow exception to the normal rule of discharge ability. If a debtor admits to fraud in a settlement agreement and later files bankruptcy the creditor may try and use the settlement agreement as the basis of a Section § 523 action in bankruptcy court.

If you signed a contract with a non-dischargeability provision and want to know your rights then contact the Dunaway Law Group at 480-389-6529 or message us HERE for a free consultation with one of our Arizona bankruptcy attorneys.

Home 9 Bankruptcy 9 Discharge Contract in Bankruptcy

Contact Us:

14 + 8 =

Search Our Site:
Blog Categories:
Most Popular Posts:

You May Also Like…

Type 2 Non-Irrigation Water Rights

Understanding Type 2 Non-Irrigation Water Rights and Their Conveyance Type 2 non-irrigation water rights play a significant role. Among the various types of water rights, This blog post delves into what these rights entail, how they can be conveyed, and the specifics...

read more

Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement

Rule 26.1 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure requires that the parties to a lawsuit to exchange Initial Disclosure Statements within 30 (thirty) days of the defendant filing an Answer. These disclosure statements are often referred to as "Rule 26.1 Statements" or...

read more

Certificate of Convenience and Necessity

Certificates of Convenience and Necessity (CC&Ns) in Arizona are regulatory tools used primarily in the utility sector, particularly for water, wastewater, and electric services. They are granted by the Arizona Corporation Commission and serve several purposes,...

read more

Certificate of Assured Water Supply

Arizona's Certificate of Assured Water Supply (CAWS) is a crucial component of the state's water management strategy. Designed to ensure sustainable water use, the CAWS guarantees that new developments in Active Management Areas (AMAs) have a 100-year assured water...

read more

Evictions and Claims of Ownership

Claims of Ownership in Justice Court Evictions Eviction lawsuits are designed to address the issue of possession and not ownership. Eviction lawsuits are to provide a summary, speedy and adequate remedy for obtaining possession of premises withheld by tenants, and for...

read more

Rule 16 of Civ. Pro- Meet and Confer

Rule 16 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure plays an important role in the pre-trial phase of a case. It is to help streamline proceedings and to "discourage wasteful, expensive, and duplicative pretrial activities." What is Rule 16 of Civil Procedure? Rule 16 of...

read more

48 Hour Notice to Enter

A 48 hour notice must be given to Arizona tenants before their landlord can legally enter the rental property. Arizona landlords have the right to periodically enter their rental properties, however, the Arizona Residential Landlord Tenant Act states that entering the...

read more